URAC Medicaid with LTSS vs. Standard Medicaid Health Plan Accreditation

Last updated: April 2026

URAC offers four distinct health plan accreditation programs: commercial Health Plan, Health Plan with LTSS, Medicaid Health Plan, and Medicaid Health Plan with Long-Term Services and Supports. For Medicaid managed care organizations, the pivotal decision is whether the standard Medicaid program or the LTSS-specific program is the right fit. This comparison addresses that question directly.

The Two Programs Defined

URAC Medicaid Health Plan Accreditation

URAC Medicaid Health Plan Accreditation evaluates whether a Medicaid managed care organization has the systems, policies, and operational infrastructure to manage care quality for a standard Medicaid population. Core standard domains include quality management and improvement, utilization management, network management, member rights and responsibilities, regulatory compliance, governance, and performance measurement. This program is appropriate for plans serving acute care, behavioral health, pharmacy benefit, or standard Medicaid populations that do not include a significant long-term services and supports component.

URAC Medicaid with LTSS Accreditation

URAC Medicaid with Long-Term Services and Supports Accreditation includes all core Medicaid Health Plan standards plus an LTSS module. Long-Term Services and Supports are defined as the broad range of paid and unpaid medical and personal care assistance that individuals may need — for weeks, months, or years — when they experience difficulty completing self-care tasks as a result of aging, chronic illness, or disability. The LTSS module adds standards specifically addressing how the plan manages this population's distinct clinical, social, and functional needs. URAC launched this program in November 2021, recognizing that standard Medicaid Health Plan accreditation was not designed for the operational complexity of MLTSS programs.

Side-by-Side Comparison

Dimension URAC Medicaid Health Plan URAC Medicaid with LTSS
Target population General Medicaid members — acute care, behavioral health, pharmacy benefit Medicaid members requiring long-term care due to aging, chronic illness, or disability; MLTSS plan enrollees
Core Medicaid standards Yes — full Medicaid Health Plan standard set Yes — same full core standard set
LTSS module standards No Yes — person-centered care planning, LTSS care coordination, HCBS compliance, LTSS network, LTSS grievance/appeals, LTSS quality metrics
Person-centered care planning General care management requirements Specific standards requiring individualized plans reflecting member goals, functional needs, and preferences — evaluated through file audits
Network adequacy scope Clinical providers — physicians, specialists, hospitals, behavioral health Clinical providers plus LTSS-specific types: personal care attendants, adult day programs, home health agencies, skilled nursing facilities, supported employment providers
HCBS settings compliance Not a distinct standard domain Addressed — plans must demonstrate active management of HCBS settings requirements consistent with federal rules
Quality measurement Plan-defined performance metrics under quality management standards Core quality management standards plus LTSS-specific metrics aligned with CMS MLTSS quality measures
Grievance and appeals Standard member grievance and appeals processes Processes specifically adapted for LTSS dispute types: service hour reductions, provider terminations, transition disputes
Preparation timeline 12–15 months typical, full cycle 12–18 months typical — additional lead time for LTSS-specific operational compliance
State recognition 15 states recognize URAC for health plan accreditation requirements Same 15 states — AR, CT, FL, IA, MI, MN, MT, ND, NJ, NM, NV, OK, TX, UT, VT
Document upload burden Reduced by 50%+ in updated program Reduced by 50%+ in updated program — same efficiency improvement applies
Typical applicants MCOs with standard Medicaid contracts; commercial health plans adding Medicaid; behavioral health plans MLTSS plan participants; plans serving I/DD, physical disability, or dual-eligible populations; plans entering MLTSS state procurements

How to Choose the Right Program

Choose URAC Medicaid Health Plan Accreditation if:

  • Your Medicaid plan does not currently participate in a state MLTSS program
  • You serve standard acute care, behavioral health, or pharmacy benefit Medicaid populations
  • LTSS services are not a significant component of your current membership or contract obligations
  • Your state's accreditation mandate references health plan accreditation without LTSS-specific requirements
  • You are pursuing initial URAC accreditation and plan to add LTSS capabilities in a future cycle

Choose URAC Medicaid with LTSS Accreditation if:

  • Your plan holds or is pursuing an MLTSS state contract
  • You serve members receiving home- and community-based services, nursing facility care, personal care attendant services, or supported employment
  • Your membership includes individuals with I/DD, physical disabilities, or dual Medicare-Medicaid eligibility
  • Your state procurement criteria for MLTSS contracts reference LTSS-specific accreditation or quality standards
  • You are competing for a new MLTSS contract and need to differentiate on demonstrated quality infrastructure
  • CMS or your state is increasing scrutiny of LTSS quality measurement and you need a third-party validation framework

Plan for the LTSS program from the start if you are expanding into LTSS:

Organizations that achieve standard Medicaid Health Plan accreditation and later transition to an MLTSS contract face a choice: operate under standard accreditation (which does not cover LTSS-specific standards) or pursue the LTSS program mid-cycle. The LTSS module requires operational lead time to generate compliant evidence — transitioning mid-cycle is possible but adds preparation burden. If your organization has a clear path toward MLTSS participation, targeting the LTSS program from initial accreditation is more efficient.

URAC Medicaid with LTSS vs. NCQA Medicaid Health Plan Accreditation for LTSS Populations

For organizations operating in the MLTSS space, the question is sometimes not URAC Medicaid vs. URAC Medicaid with LTSS — it is URAC vs. NCQA. The comparison below addresses that question for LTSS-specific context.

Dimension URAC Medicaid with LTSS NCQA Medicaid Health Plan
LTSS-specific module Yes — explicit LTSS module as a distinct standard domain LTSS-related quality measures incorporated through HEDIS and CAHPS; no separate LTSS module
Person-centered care planning standards Explicit LTSS module standard — evaluated through file audits Addressed through care management and quality measurement standards
State recognition 15 states recognize URAC for health plan accreditation NCQA has its own state recognition profile — varies by state
Standards framework URAC standards — policy-and-process oriented, documentation-heavy review NCQA standards — measurement-oriented, HEDIS and CAHPS data-driven evaluation
Review process Documentation review + validation review with leadership interviews Desktop review + HEDIS/CAHPS performance data submission + Interactive Survey Tool
Can hold both simultaneously Yes — separate bodies, separate programs, separate cycles. Dual accreditation is increasingly common among large MLTSS plans.
IHS consulting available Yes Yes

The right choice depends on which body your state and managed care contracts require. Many large MLTSS plans hold both — URAC fulfills requirements in some states and contracts, NCQA fulfills others. IHS can help you map your specific state and contract requirements to the appropriate accreditation strategy.

Not Sure Which Program Fits Your Organization?

IHS helps Medicaid managed care organizations determine the right accreditation strategy before committing preparation resources. In a discovery session, we review your current contracts, state requirements, LTSS program scope, and operational readiness to recommend the correct program — and the realistic timeline to achieve it.

IHS is led by Thomas G. Goddard, JD, PhD, former Chief Operating Officer and General Counsel of URAC. There is no substitute for that depth of knowledge when mapping a URAC accreditation strategy.

Schedule a Free Discovery Session