Service

Organ procurement organizations (OPOs) are certified and designated by CMS under the conditions for coverage in 42 CFR Part 486, Subpart G, which tie each OPO's re-certification to a 4-year cycle, outcome-measure tiers and a data-driven quality assessment and performance improvement (QAPI) program. This page is for OPO quality and governance leaders. Integral Healthcare Solutions (IHS) builds the governance, QAPI and corrective-action documentation your OPO runs; your clinical experts own donor and organ work.

Last reviewed: October 2026.

What are the CMS requirements for organ procurement organizations?

The governing text is 42 CFR Part 486, Subpart G, “Requirements for Certification and Designation and Conditions for Coverage: Organ Procurement Organizations” (§§ 486.301 to 486.360), read as current in the eCFR on September 30, 2026. CMS lists “Organ Procurement Organizations (OPOs)” among the organizations its conditions of participation and conditions for coverage apply to.

The cycle and the stakes:

The QAPI condition carries much of the documentation load. “The OPO must develop, implement, and maintain a comprehensive, data-driven QAPI program designed to monitor and evaluate performance of all donation services, including services provided under contract or arrangement” (42 CFR 486.348). Within it:

Governance has its own condition: “While an OPO may have more than one board, the OPO must have an advisory board that has both the authority described in paragraph (b) of this section and the following membership” (42 CFR 486.324(a)).

Who needs it and what triggers it

Every designated OPO works under these conditions for the whole 4-year cycle, and the re-certification survey and outcome measures decide its tier. The usual triggers for outside documentation support are:

How IHS helps

IHS works on governance and document control: the records that show how the OPO decides, reports and corrects. The process:

  1. A gap assessment of your governance and QAPI documents against 42 CFR Part 486, Subpart G, with questionnaires on decisions, reporting and corrective action.
  2. Document and evidence mapping: a crosswalk from each condition to the document or record that shows it is met.
  3. Drafting the QAPI plan, decision records, reporting and corrective-action procedures, and document control, with any clinical content reviewed and approved by your clinical experts.
  4. A mock review against the conditions.
  5. Readiness support, including drafted correspondence for your OPO to review and send. IHS drafts; your OPO submits.

Your OPO supplies its governance and QAPI documents, its performance data and its clinical experts.

The limit: donor management, organ allocation and the outcome-measure statistics are clinical and statistical work outside IHS's depth. IHS covers governance and document control only. For accreditation work, see accreditation consulting; other compliance services are listed under compliance services.

What to have ready

Each item ties to 42 CFR Part 486, Subpart G (eCFR, current as of September 30, 2026).

Bring what you have to the introductory call; IHS uses it to scope the gap assessment.

How it compares

There is no alternative federal pathway to compare. The heading of 42 CFR 486.308 is “Designation of one OPO for each service area.” The comparison an OPO makes is between building and maintaining its governance and QAPI documentation internally and bringing in outside support for parts of it. Membership in the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network runs alongside the CMS conditions under 42 CFR 486.320, “Participation in Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network”; this page does not cover the network's own bylaws and policies.

What it costs

CMS does not publish a fee schedule on the pages we reviewed; fees depend on scope. We found no published fee in 42 CFR Part 486, Subpart G. IHS scopes each engagement after a free introductory call.

What this is not

Frequently asked questions

What are the CMS conditions for coverage for organ procurement organizations?

They are the requirements in 42 CFR Part 486, Subpart G, sections 486.301 through 486.360, titled Requirements for Certification and Designation and Conditions for Coverage: Organ Procurement Organizations. They cover certification and designation, outcome measures, governance, QAPI and participation in the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network.

How does the OPO 4-year re-certification cycle work?

Under 42 CFR 486.302, the re-certification cycle is the 4-year cycle during which an OPO is certified, and 486.308 states that an OPO is normally designated for a 4-year agreement cycle. Performance on the outcome measures and the re-certification survey then place the OPO in a tier.

What are OPO Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3, and what happens in each?

Under 42 CFR 486.316(a), each OPO is designated into Tier 1, Tier 2 or Tier 3 based on its outcome measures and the re-certification survey. A Tier 1 OPO is re-certified, a Tier 2 OPO must compete to retain its DSA, and a Tier 3 OPO receives an initial de-certification determination.

What must an OPO QAPI program include under 42 CFR 486.348?

The OPO must develop, implement and maintain a comprehensive, data-driven QAPI program that monitors and evaluates all donation services, including services provided under contract or arrangement. It includes monthly death record reviews, written adverse event policies, and a process to review performance on the outcome measures in 486.318.

How often must an OPO conduct death record reviews, and in which hospitals?

At least monthly. Under 42 CFR 486.348(b), the reviews cover every Medicare and Medicaid participating hospital in the OPO's service area that has a Level I or Level II trauma center or 150 or more beds, a ventilator, and an intensive care unit.

What adverse event policies does an OPO need?

Under 42 CFR 486.348(c)(1), an OPO must establish written policies that address, at a minimum, the process for identification, reporting, analysis and prevention of adverse events that occur during the organ donation process. IHS drafts these policies and the reporting and corrective-action procedures around them.

What advisory board does CMS require for an OPO?

Under 42 CFR 486.324(a), an OPO may have more than one board, but it must have an advisory board with the authority described in paragraph (b) of that section and the membership the section lists. Check your board roster and charter against the full text.

How do OPO outcome measures feed into QAPI?

Under 42 CFR 486.348(d)(1), the QAPI program must include a process to review the OPO's performance on the outcome measure requirements in 486.318. The same measures, with the re-certification survey, determine the OPO's tier under 486.316(a).

What happens if an OPO's donation area is opened for competition?

Under 42 CFR 486.316(a), a Tier 2 OPO must compete to retain its DSA. The sources reviewed for this page do not describe the competition process itself, so those questions go to counsel and to the current CMS text.

Does an OPO need CMS approval to change its service area?

Yes. Under 42 CFR 486.310, a designated OPO considering a change in its service area must obtain prior CMS approval. IHS can draft the supporting documents; your OPO submits the request.

Talk with IHS's CEO

A 30-minute introductory meeting with Thomas G. Goddard, JD, PhD, to scope what your organization needs.

Schedule a Free Discovery Session