Certificate of Need State Tracker: CON Laws, Thresholds, and Reforms by State (2026)
Last updated: April 2026
35 states plus DC maintain active Certificate of Need laws as of 2026. Capital expenditure thresholds, covered services, filing fees, and exemptions vary dramatically by state — and the landscape changes every legislative cycle. This tracker documents the current CON status for each active state, recent 2024-2026 legislative changes, and the strategic implications for healthcare organizations planning new facilities, equipment acquisitions, or service expansions.
CON Landscape at a Glance (2026)
- 35 states + DC — maintain active CON laws
- 15 states — no CON requirements
- 2,500–3,500 — estimated CON applications filed annually across active states
- $150,000–$350,000 — external consulting and legal cost for contested applications
- 6–12 months — unopposed application timeline
- 2–3 years — contested application timeline with appeals
Note: CON laws change through ongoing state legislative cycles. IHS monitors all 35 active states. Contact IHS for current status before making project decisions based on this tracker.
States With No CON Requirements (15 States)
The following states have no Certificate of Need requirements as of 2026. Healthcare organizations can build, acquire, or expand facilities in these states without state market-entry regulatory approval (subject to normal facility licensure and CMS certification requirements):
| State | CON Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Arizona | No CON | No CON program |
| California | No CON | No CON program |
| Colorado | No CON | No CON program |
| Idaho | No CON | No CON program |
| Kansas | No CON | No CON program |
| Louisiana | Limited | Maintains Facility Need Review for Medicaid-certified facilities only — not a full CON program |
| New Hampshire | No CON | No CON program |
| New Mexico | No CON | No CON program |
| North Dakota | No CON | No CON program |
| Pennsylvania | No CON | No CON program |
| South Carolina | Partial — 2024 reform | Repealed all CON requirements except nursing homes and selective hospital provisions (2024) |
| South Dakota | No CON | No CON program |
| Texas | No CON | No CON program |
| Utah | No CON | No CON program |
| Wisconsin | No CON | No CON program |
| Wyoming | No CON | No CON program |
Active CON States: Thresholds, Fees, and Key Provisions
The following table covers the highest-volume and most strategically significant CON states. IHS provides advisory in all 35 active CON states — contact IHS for state-specific analysis not covered here.
| State | Capital Expenditure Threshold | State Filing Fee | Covered Facility Types | Recent Changes / Key Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| North Carolina | Varies by service line — set by SMFP (2025 SMFP effective Jan 1, 2025) | $5,000 base + 0.3% of CapEx over $1M; maximum $50,000 | Hospitals, nursing homes, home health agencies, hospice, dialysis, psychiatric facilities, surgical/diagnostic services, equipment acquisitions | December 2025 trial court upheld constitutionality, pausing partial repeal. 2023 interim policy exempts ASCs and MRI in urban counties over 125,000 population. SMFP methodology governs need calculations — applications must match SMFP formula exactly. |
| New York | General hospitals: $30M (doubled from $15M, 2025). ASCs and clinics: $8M (raised from $6M, 2025) | Varies by project type — contact NYSDOH | Hospitals, residential health care facilities, home care agencies, hospice, diagnostic and treatment centers, ASCs | 2025 threshold modernization doubled general hospital threshold and raised ASC/clinic threshold — many previously-covered projects now exempt from review. |
| Illinois | Hospitals: $17,787,538; Long-term care: $10,053,816; All other (including major medical equipment): $4,640,230 (effective July 1, 2025) | Graduated scale; maximum $100,000 | Hospitals, nursing homes, hospice, home health, ambulatory surgical treatment centers, diagnostic imaging, mental health facilities | Annual CPI-indexed threshold updates. July 1, 2025 update materially raised hospital threshold. |
| Tennessee | Varies by service type — set by Health Services Development Agency (HSDA) | 0.575% of total proposed project cost; maximum $95,000 | Hospitals, nursing homes, hospice, home health agencies, dialysis, psychiatric hospitals, cardiac catheterization, open-heart surgery, organ transplant, MRI | High-volume CON state. Public hearings common. Competitive proceedings frequent. LOI must be filed 1st–15th of month. Targeted behavioral health exemptions under review. |
| Georgia | General: $10M for non-bed clinical services. ASC exemption: single-specialty ASCs below specified thresholds exempt under HB 1339 (2024) | Contact Georgia DCH | Hospitals (bed additions, new construction), nursing homes, home health, hospice, ASCs (with new exemption), diagnostic imaging, cardiac programs | HB 1339 (2024) exempted single-specialty ASCs owned by single practice under specified capital and OR thresholds — significant new strategic opportunity for physician-owned ASC development in Georgia. |
| Washington State | Varies by facility type | Fixed by facility type: Hospitals $40,470; Home Health $24,666; maximum $46,253. Washington State average CON application cost (consulting/staff/legal, exclusive of state fee): $84,236 | Hospitals, nursing homes, home health agencies, hospice, psychiatric facilities, rehabilitation, ambulatory surgery, diagnostic imaging | 42 applications filed in 2024. Detailed administrative record creates strong precedent and analytical foundation for competitors to challenge applications. |
| Maryland | Highly granular — Maryland Health Care Commission (MHCC) sets project-specific thresholds by service category | Varies by project type | One of the broadest CON programs in the US — hospitals, nursing homes, home health, hospice, dialysis, psychiatric facilities, ambulatory surgical facilities, cardiac and oncology services | Maryland maintains one of the most complex and active CON programs nationally. Applications require detailed need demonstrations against MHCC-specific methodologies. Highly contested proceedings common. |
| Michigan | $4,272,500 for clinical service areas (effective January 1, 2026, CPI-indexed annually) | Contact Michigan LARA | Hospitals, nursing homes, home health, hospice, psychiatric hospitals, substance use disorder facilities, dialysis, ambulatory surgical facilities, specialized medical equipment | Annual CPI indexing brings threshold to $4,272,500 effective January 1, 2026. Michigan CON Commission reviews applications. |
| Kentucky | Varies by service line | Contact Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services | Hospitals, nursing homes, home health, hospice, psychiatric hospitals, ASCs, diagnostic imaging | High application volume: 262 complete applications over 2019-2023. Active market with significant contested proceedings. |
| Iowa | Medical equipment: $1.5M trigger threshold | Contact Iowa DIAL | Hospitals, nursing homes, hospice, home health, psychiatric facilities. Behavioral health exemptions enacted — new facilities in this category may be exempt. | Iowa DIAL administers the program. Behavioral health exemption legislation active — verify current exemption scope before planning psychiatric or substance use disorder facilities. |
| Florida | Varies by facility type | Contact Florida AHCA | Nursing homes, hospice — Florida's CON program is substantially narrower than most states following prior partial reforms | Florida has significantly limited its CON program scope. ASCs and many hospital services are no longer subject to CON review. Verify current covered services with Florida AHCA before planning projects. |
| Alabama | Varies by service line | 1.0% of estimated overall project cost; maximum $24,105 | Hospitals, nursing homes, home health, hospice, psychiatric facilities, ASCs, dialysis, diagnostic imaging | State Health Planning and Development Agency (SHPDA) administers. Detailed need methodology for each service category. |
| Connecticut | Varies by project type | Contact Connecticut OHS | Hospitals, nursing homes, home health, hospice, psychiatric facilities, ASCs, rehabilitation, dialysis | 29 applications in 2024 (13 approvals, 11 agreed settlements, 0 denials, 1 withdrawal). Connecticut Office of Health Strategy (OHS) administers. High negotiated settlement rate. |
| Virginia | Varies by service line | Contact Virginia OHPF | Hospitals, nursing homes, home health, hospice, psychiatric facilities, cardiac programs, organ transplant, rehabilitation | Virginia has a long history of contested CON proceedings. Incumbent hospitals actively oppose competitor applications. Strong legal representation typically required for contested applications. |
This table covers selected high-volume states. The remaining active CON states include: Arkansas, Delaware, Hawaii, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Jersey, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia. Contact IHS for state-specific analysis in any active CON state.
2024–2026 CON Law Changes: What Healthcare Organizations Need to Know
Georgia — HB 1339 (2024): Single-Specialty ASC Exemption
Georgia House Bill 1339 created a significant new exemption for single-specialty ASCs owned by a single medical practice, under specified capital expenditure and operating room thresholds. This opens strategic opportunities for physician-owned ASC development in Georgia that were previously blocked by the CON process. Organizations that previously evaluated Georgia ASC projects and found them CON-required should re-evaluate under HB 1339's exemption criteria.
South Carolina — 2024 Partial Repeal
South Carolina repealed all CON requirements except nursing homes and selective hospital provisions in 2024. For most facility types — ASCs, home health, hospice, diagnostic imaging — South Carolina is now effectively a non-CON state. Organizations planning South Carolina projects previously blocked by CON review should reassess project viability under the post-repeal framework.
New York — 2025 Threshold Modernization
New York doubled the general hospital capital expenditure threshold from $15M to $30M and raised the ASC and clinic threshold from $6M to $8M in 2025. Many projects that previously triggered CON review in New York are now exempt. Health systems and ASC operators with pending or planned New York projects should verify whether the updated thresholds remove their project from CON coverage entirely.
Illinois — July 1, 2025 Threshold Update
Illinois updated its capital expenditure thresholds effective July 1, 2025: hospitals — $17,787,538; long-term care — $10,053,816; all other applicants including major medical equipment — $4,640,230. Projects near the prior thresholds may now fall below review requirements under the updated figures.
North Carolina — December 2025 Constitutional Ruling
North Carolina's December 2025 trial court ruling upheld the constitutionality of the state's CON laws, pausing a near-total repeal that had been scheduled to take effect. The ruling restores regulatory uncertainty for organizations that had been planning North Carolina projects under the assumption that CON would be eliminated. North Carolina currently operates under a 2023 interim policy exempting ASCs and MRI acquisitions in urban counties with populations over 125,000 — a narrower exemption than the full repeal that was anticipated. The litigation continues — IHS monitors and advises on the current state of North Carolina CON law for all project types.
Michigan — January 1, 2026 Threshold CPI Update
Michigan's annual CPI-indexed threshold update brought the capital expenditure threshold for clinical service areas to $4,272,500 effective January 1, 2026. Projects near the prior threshold should confirm whether the updated figure affects their CON requirement.
Iowa, Oklahoma, Washington — Behavioral Health Exemptions
Multiple states have enacted or are considering CON exemptions specifically for behavioral health facilities — psychiatric hospitals, residential treatment centers, and substance use disorder treatment programs — in response to documented mental health crises and inadequate behavioral health capacity. Organizations planning behavioral health facilities should verify current exemption scope before assuming CON review is required.
The CON Application Process: What Every State Requires
Despite state-by-state variation in thresholds, fees, and covered services, the CON application process follows a consistent structure across active states:
- Pre-Application Strategic Assessment (Months 1–3). Market feasibility analysis; State Medical Facilities Plan (or equivalent) methodology review; competitive landscape assessment; identification of likely opposing applicants. IHS conducts pre-application analysis before any client files an LOI.
- Letter of Intent (LOI) (Month 4). Formal notification to the state agency and public. LOI deadlines are strict — Tennessee requires LOI filing on the 1st–15th of the month; Georgia requires exactly 25 days before the application. Errors in LOI scope constrain the application.
- Application Submission (Month 5). Exhaustive application package including epidemiological need analysis, financial projections, architectural schematics, staffing models, patient transfer agreements, and non-refundable state filing fee. Applications that do not match the state's SMFP methodology are categorically denied.
- Public Comment and Hearing (Months 6–8). Competitors file written opposition. Public hearings allow competing applicants and incumbents to present expert testimony, cross-examine financial projections, and argue need methodology. IHS prepares clients for hearing testimony and manages competing application responses.
- Agency Decision and Appeals (Months 9+). State agency approves, conditionally approves, or denies. Appeals filed in state courts add 1–2 years to the timeline. IHS coordinates with legal counsel on appeal strategy.
- Implementation and Licensure Survey (Post-Approval). CON approval is permission to build — not a license to operate. State licensure survey after construction completion issues the facility license. CMS certification follows for Medicare/Medicaid participation.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do all states require a CON for home health agencies?
No. CON requirements for home health agencies vary by state. North Carolina requires SMFP approval for new home health agencies before state licensure can proceed. Many other active CON states cover home health. However, 15 states plus South Carolina (post-2024) have no CON requirements for home health, and several additional states have exemptions for home health in certain service areas or under certain capacity thresholds. IHS provides state-specific home health CON analysis for operators planning new agency locations.
Can incumbents block a competitor's CON application?
Yes. In states with competitive or comparative review processes, incumbent hospitals, health systems, and competing applicants can file formal opposition, submit expert testimony, and challenge the applicant's need analysis at public hearings. Incumbents have a strong financial incentive to oppose independent ASC and specialty facility applications — particularly when commercially insured patient volume is at stake. IHS prepares CON applications specifically to withstand incumbent opposition: the need analysis is built to anticipate and address competitor arguments, not to react to them after the fact.
What is the most common reason CON applications are denied?
The most common denial reason is failure to demonstrate quantitative need using the state's specific methodology. Applicants that use independent demographic data showing genuine community need are still denied when that data does not match the state agency's formula — typically the State Medical Facilities Plan or equivalent. In North Carolina, applicants must use the SMFP methodology exactly; applications that use alternative need calculation methods are categorically denied even when the underlying demand is real. IHS builds need analyses from the state methodology first, then supplements with supporting data.
Is a CON required to acquire an existing healthcare facility?
It depends on the state and the nature of the transaction. Most states distinguish between capital expenditures for new construction or new services (typically covered) and ownership transfers of existing facilities (coverage varies significantly). In some states, a change of ownership triggers CON review; in others, it does not. IHS conducts CON threshold analysis for acquisition transactions before any purchase agreement is executed — an unexpected CON requirement discovered post-LOI can delay a transaction by 12–24 months.
Does IHS work in all 35 active CON states?
Yes. IHS provides CON consulting in all 35 active CON states plus DC, with deep expertise in North Carolina (SMFP methodology, home health and hospice sequencing, ongoing repeal litigation), Tennessee (competitive proceedings, public hearing preparation), Georgia (post-HB 1339 strategy), New York (threshold modernization analysis), and Illinois (annual threshold update tracking). Thomas G. Goddard, JD, PhD provides regulatory legal analysis and, where appropriate, expert testimony support for contested CON applications.
Planning a Healthcare Project in a CON State?
IHS provides CON threshold analysis, pre-application competitive intelligence, full-cycle application support, and hearing preparation for healthcare organizations in all 35 active CON states. Before filing a Letter of Intent — or before concluding your project does not require a CON — schedule a strategy consultation.